Luyện tập: Charges for Foreign Visitors
06/11/2024 2024-11-06 16:13Luyện tập: Charges for Foreign Visitors
Topic statementIt is sometimes argued that tourists from overseas should be chargedtính giá more than local residentscư dân to visit important sites and monumentscông trình tưởng niệm. OpinionI completely disagree with this idea.
Topic statementThe argument in favour of higher prices for foreign tourists would be that culturalthuộc về văn hóa or historical attractionsđịa điểm du lịch lịch sử often depend onphụ thuộc vào state subsidiestrợ cấp nhà nước to keep them going, which means that the resident population already pays money to these sites through the tax systemhệ thống thuế. OpinionHowever, I believe this to be a very shortsightedthiển cận view. Supporting statementForeign tourists contribute to the economy of the host country with the money they spend on a wide range of goods and services, including food, souvenirsđồ lưu niệm, accommodationchỗ ăn ở and travel. Supporting statementThe governments and inhabitantscư dân of every country should be happy to subsidisetrợ giá important tourist sites and encourage people from the rest of the world to visit them.
Topic statementIf travellers realised that they would have to pay more to visit historical and cultural attractions in a particularcụ thể nation, they would perhaps decide not to go to that country on holiday. ExampleTo take the UK as an example, the tourism industryngành công nghiệp du lịch and many related jobs rely on visitors coming to the country to see places like Windsor Castle or Saint Paul’s Cathedral. Supporting statementThese two sites charge the same price regardless ofbất kể nationalityquốc tịch, and this helps to promotequảng bá the nation’s cultural heritagedi sản văn hóa. Supporting statementIf overseas tourists stopped coming due to higher prices, there would be a risk of insufficientkhông đủ, thiếu fundingsự cấp vốn for the maintenancesự bảo trì of these important buildings.
OpinionIn conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made to attractthu hút tourists from overseas, and it would be counterproductivephản tác dụng to make them pay more than local residents.
It is sometimes argued that tourists from overseas should be tính giá more than local cư dân to visit important sites and công trình tưởng niệm. I completely disagree with this idea.
The argument in favour of higher prices for foreign tourists would be that thuộc về văn hóa or địa điểm du lịch lịch sử often phụ thuộc vào trợ cấp nhà nước to keep them going, which means that the resident population already pays money to these sites through the hệ thống thuế. However, I believe this to be a very thiển cận view. Foreign tourists contribute to the economy of the host country with the money they spend on a wide range of goods and services, including food, đồ lưu niệm, chỗ ăn ở and travel. The governments and cư dân of every country should be happy to trợ giá important tourist sites and encourage people from the rest of the world to visit them.
If travellers realised that they would have to pay more to visit historical and cultural attractions in a cụ thể nation, they would perhaps decide not to go to that country on holiday. To take the UK as an example, the ngành công nghiệp du lịch and many related jobs rely on visitors coming to the country to see places like Windsor Castle or Saint Paul’s Cathedral. These two sites charge the same price bất kể quốc tịch, and this helps to quảng bá the nation’s di sản văn hóa. If overseas tourists stopped coming due to higher prices, there would be a risk of không đủ, thiếu sự cấp vốn for the sự bảo trì of these important buildings.
In conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made to thu hút tourists from overseas, and it would be phản tác dụng to make them pay more than local residents.
