Luyện tập: Essay 4
15/10/2024 2024-10-15 18:21Luyện tập: Essay 4
The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table gives information about poverty rates among six types of household in Australia in the year 1999.
It is noticeable that levels of poverty were higher for single people than for couples, and people with children were more likely to be poor than those without. Poverty rates were considerably lower among elderly people.
Overall, 11% of Australians, or 1,837,000 people, were living in poverty in 1999. Aged people were the least likely to be poor, with poverty levels of 6% and 4% for single aged people and aged couples respectively.
Just over one fifth of single parents were living in /poverty, whereas only 12% of parents living with a partner were classed as poor. The same pattern can be seen for people with no children: while 19% of single people in this group were living below the poverty line, the figure for couples was much lower, at only 7%.
The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Opening statementThe table gives information about poverty ratestỷ lệ đói nghèo among six types of householdkiểu hộ gia đình in Australia in the year 1999.
Overall statementIt is noticeable that levels of povertymức độ nghèo were highercao hơn for single peoplenhững người độc thân than for couplescác cặp vợ chồng, and people with childrennhững người có con were more likelycó nhiều khả năng to be poornghèo than those withoutnhững người không có con. Overall statementPoverty rates were considerably lowerthấp hơn đáng kể among elderly peoplengười cao tuổi.
Overall, 11% of Australiansnhững người Úc, or 1,837,000 people, were living in povertysống trong cảnh nghèo đói in 1999. Aged peoplengười cao tuổi were the least likelyít có khả năng nhất to be poor, with poverty levelsmức độ nghèo đói of 6% and 4% for single aged people and aged couples respectively.
Just over one fifth of single parentscha mẹ đơn thân were living in /poverty, whereas only 12% of parents living with a partnercha mẹ sống với con cái were classed as poorđược xếp vào diện nghèo. The same pattern can be seencó thể thấy một xu hướng tương tự for people with no childrennhững người không có con: while 19% of single people in this group were living below the poverty linesống dưới ngưỡng nghèo (=living in poverty), the figurecon số for couples was much lowerthấp hơn nhiều, at only 7%.