Luyện tập: Education: Truancy in Children
31/10/2024 2024-10-31 15:06Luyện tập: Education: Truancy in Children
Topic statementTraditionally, children have begun studying foreign languages at secondary school, but introducinggiới thiệu them earlier is recommended by some educationalistsnhà giáo dục học. Topic statementThis policy has been adoptedáp dụng, thực hiện by some educational authoritieschính quyền giáo dục or individual schools, with both positive and negative outcomeskết quả.
Topic statementThe obvious argument in its favour is that young children pick upbắt đầu học languages much more easily than teenagers. Supporting statementTheir brains are still programmedhọc, hiểu to acquiređạt được their mother tonguetiếng mẹ đẻ, which facilitateslàm cho dễ dàng learning another language, and unlike adolescentsthanh thiếu niên, they are not inhibitedhạn chế by self-consciousnesssự tự ý thức.
The greater flexibilitysự linh hoạt of the primary timetablethời khóa biểu của tiểu học allows for more frequent, shorter sessions and for a play-centred approachcách tiếp cận lấy trò chơi làm trung tâm, thus maintaining learners’ enthusiasmsự hăng hái and progresssự tiến triển. Their command of the languagesự làm chủ ngôn ngữ in later life will benefit from this early exposuresự tiếp cận sớm, while learning other languages subsequently will be easier for them. They may also gain a better understanding ofhiểu biết rõ hơn về other cultures.
Topic statementThere are, however, some disadvantages. Supporting statementPrimary school teachers are generalistsngười bao hàm, and may not have the necessary language skills themselves. If specialistschuyên gia have to be brought in to delivertruyền đạt these sessions, the flexibility referred to above is diminishedgiảm bớt. Alternative statementIf primary language teaching is not standardisedtiêu chuẩn hóa, secondary schools could be faced with a great variety of levels in different languages within their intakelượng thông tin lấy vào, resulting in a classroom experience which undoes the earlier gainshoàn trả lại những gì đã nhận được. There is no advantage if enthusiastic primary pupils become demotivatednhụt chí, giảm bớt động lực as soon as they change schools. SolutionHowever, these issues can be addressedchỉ ra, nhắm vào strategically within the policy adopted.
SummaryAnything which encourages language learning benefits society culturally and economically, and early exposure to language learning contributesđóng góp to this. SummaryYoung children’s innate abilitieskhả năng bẩm sinh should be harnessedkhai thác to make these benefits more achievablecó thể đạt được.
Traditionally, children have begun studying foreign languages at secondary school, but giới thiệu them earlier is recommended by some nhà giáo dục học. This policy has been áp dụng, thực hiện by some chính quyền giáo dục or individual schools, with both positive and negative kết quả.
The obvious argument in its favour is that young children bắt đầu học languages much more easily than teenagers. Their brains are still học, hiểu to đạt được their tiếng mẹ đẻ, which làm cho dễ dàng learning another language, and unlike thanh thiếu niên, they are not hạn chế by sự tự ý thức.
The greater sự linh hoạt of the thời khóa biểu của tiểu học allows for more frequent, shorter sessions and for cách tiếp cận lấy trò chơi làm trung tâm, thus maintaining learners’ sự hăng hái and sự tiến triển. Their sự làm chủ ngôn ngữ in later life will benefit from this sự tiếp cận sớm, while learning other languages subsequently will be easier for them. They may also hiểu biết rõ hơn về other cultures.
There are, however, some disadvantages. Primary school teachers are người bao hàm, and may not have the necessary language skills themselves. If chuyên gia have to be brought in to truyền đạt these sessions, the flexibility referred to above is giảm bớt. If primary language teaching is not tiêu chuẩn hóa, secondary schools could be faced with a great variety of levels in different languages within their lượng thông tin lấy vào, resulting in a classroom experience which hoàn trả lại những gì đã nhận được. There is no advantage if enthusiastic primary pupils become nhụt chí, giảm bớt động lực as soon as they change schools. However, these issues can be chỉ ra, nhắm vào strategically within the policy adopted.
Anything which encourages language learning benefits society culturally and economically, and early exposure to language learning đóng góp to this. Young children’s khả năng bẩm sinh should be khai thác to make these benefits more có thể đạt được.
Traditionally, children have begun studying foreign languages at secondary school, but giới thiệu them earlier is recommended by some nhà giáo dục học. This policy has been áp dụng, thực hiện by some chính quyền giáo dục or individual schools, with both positive and negative kết quả.
The obvious argument in its favour is that young children bắt đầu học languages much more easily than teenagers. Their brains are still học, hiểu to đạt được their tiếng mẹ đẻ, which làm cho dễ dàng learning another language, and unlike thanh thiếu niên, they are not hạn chế by sự tự ý thức.
The greater sự linh hoạt of the thời khóa biểu của tiểu học allows for more frequent, shorter sessions and for cách tiếp cận lấy trò chơi làm trung tâm, thus maintaining learners’ sự hăng hái and sự tiến triển. Their sự làm chủ ngôn ngữ in later life will benefit from this sự tiếp cận sớm, while learning other languages subsequently will be easier for them. They may also hiểu biết rõ hơn về other cultures.
There are, however, some disadvantages. Primary school teachers are người bao hàm, and may not have the necessary language skills themselves. If chuyên gia have to be brought in to truyền đạt these sessions, the flexibility referred to above is giảm bớt. If primary language teaching is not tiêu chuẩn hóa, secondary schools could be faced with a great variety of levels in different languages within their lượng thông tin lấy vào, resulting in a classroom experience which hoàn trả lại những gì đã nhận được. There is no advantage if enthusiastic primary pupils become nhụt chí, giảm bớt động lực as soon as they change schools. However, these issues can be chỉ ra, nhắm vào strategically within the policy adopted.
Anything which encourages language learning benefits society culturally and economically, and early exposure to language learning đóng góp to this. Young children’s khả năng bẩm sinh should be khai thác to make these benefits more có thể đạt được.
