Luyện tập: Environment: Light Pollution
31/10/2024 2024-10-31 10:43Luyện tập: Environment: Light Pollution
Topic statementAs more of us live in cities, the question of light pollution is becoming increasingly topicalcó tính thời sự and important to address. Supporting statementThere seem to be three main causes, and also two key solutions which we could take to lessenlàm giảm bớt the problem.
Topic statementThe main cause is almost certainly the use of lighting for advertising in public spaces. ExampleFor example, if we look at cities such as Tokyo or Moscow, almost all available surfaces are fitted with some form of light, often for announcements or commercial use. ResultThis huge expansionsự lan rộng in illuminatedchiếu sáng advertising is partly a result of competitive pressures, and also due to the power of such advertising, with flashing lights, video and pictures. Topic statementA secondarythứ nhì cause is the large number of street lamps and security lightsđèn chiếu sáng bảo vệ used in cities, which are intendedcó ý đinh to reduce accidents and crime by removing shadow areas at night. Topic statementFinally, high levels of night-time traffic also produce light pollution, as drivers use headlampsđèn pha which shine into windows and gardens after dark.
Topic statementTurning to possible remediesbiện pháp, it might be temptinghấp dẫn, lôi cuốn for governments to ban or regulatequy định electric advertising billboardsbảng quảng cáo, but in many cases (for example in New York or London) these signs are now a local symbolbiểu tượng. Supporting statementIt would also be difficult to reduce security and traffic lights, because these are needed to keep residentscư dân and travellers safe. SolutionI would rather see a government-backedđược hỗ trợ bởi chính phủ programme of light protection for private homes, involving better insulationsự cô lập against outside light after dark. Supporting statementThis would allow residents to rest in their homes without being disturbedlàm gián đoạn by the lights in the streets outside. SolutionAdditionally, a voluntarytự nguyện ‘dark day’ once per week, supported by business advertisersnhà quảng cáo, in which all commercialthương mại lighting is reduced, would allow residents to experience a more natural level of darkness without jeopardizinglàm nguy hiểm their safety.
SummaryIn summary, advertising and public lighting are the main factors behind this problem. SummaryBetter light insulation, and occasionalđịnh kỳ voluntary reductions in commercial lighting, would greatly help the residents to live more in peace with a brightly illuminated environment.
As more of us live in cities, the question of light pollution is becoming increasingly có tính thời sự and important to address. There seem to be three main causes, and also two key solutions which we could take to làm giảm bớt the problem.
The main cause is almost certainly the use of lighting for advertising in public spaces. For example, if we look at cities such as Tokyo or Moscow, almost all available surfaces are fitted with some form of light, often for announcements or commercial use. This huge sự lan rộng in chiếu sáng advertising is partly a result of competitive pressures, and also due to the power of such advertising, with flashing lights, video and pictures. A thứ nhì cause is the large number of street lamps and đèn chiếu sáng bảo vệ used in cities, which are có ý đinh to reduce accidents and crime by removing shadow areas at night. Finally, high levels of night-time traffic also produce light pollution, as drivers use đèn pha which shine into windows and gardens after dark.
Turning to possible biện pháp, it might be hấp dẫn, lôi cuốn for governments to ban or quy định electric advertising bảng quảng cáo, but in many cases (for example in New York or London) these signs are now a local biểu tượng. It would also be difficult to reduce security and traffic lights, because these are needed to keep cư dân and travellers safe. I would rather see a được hỗ trợ bởi chính phủ programme of light protection for private homes, involving better sự cô lập against outside light after dark. This would allow residents to rest in their homes without being làm gián đoạn by the lights in the streets outside. Additionally, a tự nguyện ‘dark day’ once per week, supported by business nhà quảng cáo, in which all thương mại lighting is reduced, would allow residents to experience a more natural level of darkness without làm nguy hiểm their safety.
In summary, advertising and public lighting are the main factors behind this problem. Better light insulation, and định kỳ voluntary reductions in commercial lighting, would greatly help the residents to live more in peace with a brightly illuminated environment.
As more of us live in cities, the question of light pollution is becoming increasingly có tính thời sự and important to address. There seem to be three main causes, and also two key solutions which we could take to làm giảm bớt the problem.
The main cause is almost certainly the use of lighting for advertising in public spaces. For example, if we look at cities such as Tokyo or Moscow, almost all available surfaces are fitted with some form of light, often for announcements or commercial use. This huge sự lan rộng in chiếu sáng advertising is partly a result of competitive pressures, and also due to the power of such advertising, with flashing lights, video and pictures. A thứ nhì cause is the large number of street lamps and đèn chiếu sáng bảo vệ used in cities, which are có ý đinh to reduce accidents and crime by removing shadow areas at night. Finally, high levels of night-time traffic also produce light pollution, as drivers use đèn pha which shine into windows and gardens after dark.
Turning to possible biện pháp, it might be hấp dẫn, lôi cuốn for governments to ban or quy định electric advertising bảng quảng cáo, but in many cases (for example in New York or London) these signs are now a local biểu tượng. It would also be difficult to reduce security and traffic lights, because these are needed to keep cư dân and travellers safe. I would rather see a được hỗ trợ bởi chính phủ programme of light protection for private homes, involving better sự cô lập against outside light after dark. This would allow residents to rest in their homes without being làm gián đoạn by the lights in the streets outside. Additionally, a tự nguyện ‘dark day’ once per week, supported by business nhà quảng cáo, in which all thương mại lighting is reduced, would allow residents to experience a more natural level of darkness without làm nguy hiểm their safety.
In summary, advertising and public lighting are the main factors behind this problem. Better light insulation, and định kỳ voluntary reductions in commercial lighting, would greatly help the residents to live more in peace with a brightly illuminated environment.
