Luyện tập: Science & Space Exploration: Spending Money on Space Exploration
31/10/2024 2024-10-31 14:47Luyện tập: Science & Space Exploration: Spending Money on Space Exploration
Topic statementSpace explorationsự khám phá is a subject which provokeskích thích, gợi lên great emotions as well as scientific interest, and at times the two become somewhatmột cách nào đó blurredmù mờ. Supporting statementThere are strong arguments on both sides of the debatetranh luận about whether to continue space travel, which we will discuss here.
Topic statementOn the one hand, those who urgethúc giục the continued exploration of space say that this field has given us substantialtrọng yếu, có giá trị technical advancessự tiên tiến về kỹ thuật over the past fifty years, ranging from better plastics and alloyshợp kim to a greater understanding of flight and gravitytrọng lực. Topic statementFurthermore, they claim that further investigationssự điều tra nghiên cứu will help to solve some of mankind’sloài người most pressing issuesvấn đề, such as lack of food and environmental damage, because the study of (for example) biology and chemistry can be carried out more radicallytriệt để in space. ExampleRecent experiments on the International Space Station in the field of geneticsdi truyền học certainly seem to support this view.
Topic statementConversely, however, people who opposephản đối more funding for space research point to the extremely high costs involved, compared to the practicalthực tế benefits which are gained for almost all members of the human racegiống loài. ExampleFor example, these opponentsngười phản đối state that all the major developments in terms of medicine, genetics, materials and mechanicsmáy móc, cơ giới học have actually been as a result of terrestrialtrên mặt đất science and experiments, rather than stemmingbắt nguồn from space exploration. Topic statementMoreover, they feel that space investigation is largely an academic pursuitsự theo đuổi, fascinatinglôi cuốn though it is, and that at a time of austeritysự khắc khổ our funding should be directedhướng đến to more practicalthực tế programmes to help people. Supporting statementIt is indeed true that addressing some major human challengesthử thách such as pollution control, protection of wildlife and greater politicalthuộc về chính trị stabilitysự ổn định would not require any involvementsự dính dáng at all by space scientists.
OpinionOverall, I feel that the opponents of high funding for space have the stronger argument at present. SummaryIt seems that the enormous sumstổng số tiền involved could be used more practically to deal with some of our most immediate problems. SummaryAfter all, space will always be there to explore, when funding and other problems make its research more affordablecó thể chi trả for us as a species.
Space sự khám phá is a subject which kích thích, gợi lên great emotions as well as scientific interest, and at times the two become một cách nào đó mù mờ. There are strong arguments on both sides of the tranh luận about whether to continue space travel, which we will discuss here.
On the one hand, those who thúc giục the continued exploration of space say that this field has given us trọng yếu, có giá trị sự tiên tiến về kỹ thuật over the past fifty years, ranging from better plastics and hợp kim to a greater understanding of flight and trọng lực. Furthermore, they claim that further sự điều tra nghiên cứu will help to solve some of loài người most pressing vấn đề, such as lack of food and environmental damage, because the study of (for example) biology and chemistry can be carried out more triệt để in space. Recent experiments on the International Space Station in the field of di truyền học certainly seem to support this view.
Conversely, however, people who phản đối more funding for space research point to the extremely high costs involved, compared to the thực tế benefits which are gained for almost all members of the human giống loài. For example, these người phản đối state that all the major developments in terms of medicine, genetics, materials and máy móc, cơ giới học have actually been as a result of trên mặt đất science and experiments, rather than bắt nguồn from space exploration. Moreover, they feel that space investigation is largely an academic sự theo đuổi, lôi cuốn though it is, and that at a time of sự khắc khổ our funding should be hướng đến to more thực tế programmes to help people. It is indeed true that addressing some major human thử thách such as pollution control, protection of wildlife and greater thuộc về chính trị sự ổn định would not require any sự dính dáng at all by space scientists.
Overall, I feel that the opponents of high funding for space have the stronger argument at present. It seems that the enormous tổng số tiền involved could be used more practically to deal with some of our most immediate problems. After all, space will always be there to explore, when funding and other problems make its research more có thể chi trả for us as a species.
Space sự khám phá is a subject which kích thích, gợi lên great emotions as well as scientific interest, and at times the two become một cách nào đó mù mờ. There are strong arguments on both sides of the tranh luận about whether to continue space travel, which we will discuss here.
On the one hand, those who thúc giục the continued exploration of space say that this field has given us trọng yếu, có giá trị sự tiên tiến về kỹ thuật over the past fifty years, ranging from better plastics and hợp kim to a greater understanding of flight and trọng lực. Furthermore, they claim that further sự điều tra nghiên cứu will help to solve some of loài người most pressing vấn đề, such as lack of food and environmental damage, because the study of (for example) biology and chemistry can be carried out more triệt để in space. Recent experiments on the International Space Station in the field of di truyền học certainly seem to support this view.
Conversely, however, people who phản đối more funding for space research point to the extremely high costs involved, compared to the thực tế benefits which are gained for almost all members of the human giống loài. For example, these người phản đối state that all the major developments in terms of medicine, genetics, materials and máy móc, cơ giới học have actually been as a result of trên mặt đất science and experiments, rather than bắt nguồn from space exploration. Moreover, they feel that space investigation is largely an academic sự theo đuổi, lôi cuốn though it is, and that at a time of sự khắc khổ our funding should be hướng đến to more thực tế programmes to help people. It is indeed true that addressing some major human thử thách such as pollution control, protection of wildlife and greater thuộc về chính trị sự ổn định would not require any sự dính dáng at all by space scientists.
Overall, I feel that the opponents of high funding for space have the stronger argument at present. It seems that the enormous tổng số tiền involved could be used more practically to deal with some of our most immediate problems. After all, space will always be there to explore, when funding and other problems make its research more có thể chi trả for us as a species.
