Luyện tập: Society: Life in the Countryside
31/10/2024 2024-10-31 14:44Luyện tập: Society: Life in the Countryside
Topic statementThere can be few choices in life more important than where to settle as a family, and the question of an urban or ruralvùng nông thôn location is complex. OpinionThere are strong arguments for and against living in the countryside, as we will discuss now.
Topic statementOn the one hand, it might be said that the countryside is rather a backwatersự tù túng, with fewer cultural amenitiessự tiện nghi than a city in the form of museums, theatres and even sporting events. Supporting statementThis may mean that families become isolatedcô lập, especially as rural depopulationsự giảm dân số nông thôn leaves fewer country dwellersdân quê in the area, as we see, for example, in central France. Supporting statementAdded to this is the scarcitysự hiếm có of schools and colleges, meaning that children may need to travel long distances for their education. Supporting statementFinally, career options may be more limited in the countryside for both parents and children, resulting in rural unemploymentsự thất nghiệp ở nông thôn and long-term rural povertysự đói nghèo ở nông thôn in the worst cases.
Topic statementConversely, life in the countryside has rewards which go beyondmaterial considerationscân nhắc về vật chất. ExampleFor example, the abundancesự phong phú, dư thừa of natural resources such as land, wildlife forestrymiền rừng hoang dã and water bodiesvùng nước means that a comparatively simple life can be lived at a subsistencesự sinh kế level. Supporting statementMany country residents are self-sufficient smallholdershộ dân tự cung tự cấp in this sense, safeguarding them from the changes in the wider economynền kinh tế rộn lớn hơn which can afflict city dwellerslàm phiền dân ở quê. Supporting statementIf the parents are farmers, children learn the importance of animal husbandrytrông nom động vật, methods of farming such as crop rotationsự luân canh and irrigationthủy lợi, and generally may become more in tune with the natural world as a result. Supporting statementFinally, as technology enables children to undertakethực hiện distance learning or remote viewingxem từ xa of cultural attractions such as museums, they should be less isolated from their cultural heritage.
OpinionOverall, it seems to me that quality of life in the countryside today is indeed quite high, with its advantages of resources, self-sufficiency and environmental awarenessý thức về môi trường. SummaryThis is especially true now that communications are reducing the risk of isolation in such far-flungxa, bao la communities.
There can be few choices in life more important than where to settle as a family, and the question of an urban or vùng nông thôn location is complex. There are strong arguments for and against living in the countryside, as we will discuss now.
On the one hand, it might be said that the countryside is rather a sự tù túng, with fewer cultural sự tiện nghi than a city in the form of museums, theatres and even sporting events. This may mean that families become cô lập, especially as sự giảm dân số nông thôn leaves fewer dân quê in the area, as we see, for example, in central France. Added to this is the sự hiếm có of schools and colleges, meaning that children may need to travel long distances for their education. Finally, career options may be more limited in the countryside for both parents and children, resulting in sự thất nghiệp ở nông thôn and long-term sự đói nghèo ở nông thôn in the worst cases.
Conversely, life in the countryside has rewards which go beyondcân nhắc về vật chất. For example, the sự phong phú, dư thừa of natural resources such as land, miền rừng hoang dã and vùng nước means that a comparatively simple life can be lived at a sự sinh kế level. Many country residents are hộ dân tự cung tự cấp in this sense, safeguarding them from the changes in the nền kinh tế rộn lớn hơn which canlàm phiền dân ở quê. If the parents are farmers, children learn the importance of trông nom động vật, methods of farming such as sự luân canh and thủy lợi, and generally may become more in tune with the natural world as a result. Finally, as technology enables children to thực hiện distance learning or xem từ xa of cultural attractions such as museums, they should be less isolated from their cultural heritage.
Overall, it seems to me that quality of life in the countryside today is indeed quite high, with its advantages of resources, self-sufficiency and ý thức về môi trường. This is especially true now that communications are reducing the risk of isolation in such xa, bao la communities.
There can be few choices in life more important than where to settle as a family, and the question of an urban or vùng nông thôn location is complex. There are strong arguments for and against living in the countryside, as we will discuss now.
On the one hand, it might be said that the countryside is rather a sự tù túng, with fewer cultural sự tiện nghi than a city in the form of museums, theatres and even sporting events. This may mean that families become cô lập, especially as sự giảm dân số nông thôn leaves fewer dân quê in the area, as we see, for example, in central France. Added to this is the sự hiếm có of schools and colleges, meaning that children may need to travel long distances for their education. Finally, career options may be more limited in the countryside for both parents and children, resulting in sự thất nghiệp ở nông thôn and long-term sự đói nghèo ở nông thôn in the worst cases.
Conversely, life in the countryside has rewards which go beyondcân nhắc về vật chất. For example, the sự phong phú, dư thừa of natural resources such as land, miền rừng hoang dã and vùng nước means that a comparatively simple life can be lived at a sự sinh kế level. Many country residents are hộ dân tự cung tự cấp in this sense, safeguarding them from the changes in the nền kinh tế rộn lớn hơn which canlàm phiền dân ở quê. If the parents are farmers, children learn the importance of trông nom động vật, methods of farming such as sự luân canh and thủy lợi, and generally may become more in tune with the natural world as a result. Finally, as technology enables children to thực hiện distance learning or xem từ xa of cultural attractions such as museums, they should be less isolated from their cultural heritage.
Overall, it seems to me that quality of life in the countryside today is indeed quite high, with its advantages of resources, self-sufficiency and ý thức về môi trường. This is especially true now that communications are reducing the risk of isolation in such xa, bao la communities.
