Luyện tập: Transport: Petrol Price
31/10/2024 2024-10-31 14:23Luyện tập: Transport: Petrol Price
Topic statementThere is no doubt that traffic and pollution from vehicles have become huge problems, both in cities and on motorways everywhere. Topic statementSolving these problems is likely to need more than a simple rise in the price of petrol.
Topic statementWhile it is undeniable that private carxe ô tô cá nhân use is one of the main causes of the increase in traffic and pollution, higher fuel costsgiá xăng are unlikely to limitgiới hạn the number of drivers for long. Supporting statementAs this policy would also affect the cost of public transport, it would be very unpopularkhông phổ biến with everyone who needs to travel on the roads. But there are various other measuresbiện pháp that could be implementedthi hành that would have a huge effect on these problems.
OpinionI think to tacklexử lý the problem of pollution, cleaner fuelsnhiên liệu sạch hơn (tức nhiên liệu không ít hại đến môi trường hơn) need to be developed. Topic statementThe technology is already available to produce electric cars that would be both quieter and cleaner to use. Supporting statementPersuading manufacturers and travellers to adoptáp dụng this new technology would be a more effective strategy for improving air qualitychất lượng không khí, especially in cities.
Topic statementHowever, traffic congestionsự tắc nghẽn giao thông will not be solved by changing the type of private vehiclephương tiện cá nhân people can use. Supporting statementTo do this, we need to improve the choice of public transport services available to travellers. ExampleFor example, if sufficientđủ sky trains and underground train systems were built and effectively maintained in our major cities, then traffic on the roads would be dramatically reduced. ExampleLong-distance train and coach services should be made attractive and affordablecó thể chi trả alternativessự thay thế to drive your own car for long journeys.
SummaryIn conclusion, I think that long-term traffic and pollution reductions would depend on educatinggiáo dục the public to use public transport more, and on governments using public moneytiền công to construct and run efficiently.
There is no doubt that traffic and pollution from vehicles have become huge problems, both in cities and on motorways everywhere. Solving these problems is likely to need more than a simple rise in the price of petrol.
While it is undeniable that xe ô tô cá nhân use is one of the main causes of the increase in traffic and pollution, higher giá xăng are unlikely to giới hạn the number of drivers for long. As this policy would also affect the cost of public transport, it would be very không phổ biến with everyone who needs to travel on the roads. But there are various other biện pháp that could be thi hành that would have a huge effect on these problems.
I think to xử lý the problem of pollution, nhiên liệu sạch hơn (tức nhiên liệu không ít hại đến môi trường hơn) need to be developed. The technology is already available to produce electric cars that would be both quieter and cleaner to use. Persuading manufacturers and travellers to áp dụng this new technology would be a more effective strategy for improving chất lượng không khí, especially in cities.
However, sự tắc nghẽn giao thông will not be solved by changing the type of phương tiện cá nhân people can use. To do this, we need to improve the choice of public transport services available to travellers. For example, if đủ sky trains and underground train systems were built and effectively maintained in our major cities, then traffic on the roads would be dramatically reduced. Long-distance train and coach services should be made attractive and có thể chi trả sự thay thế to drive your own car for long journeys.
In conclusion, I think that long-term traffic and pollution reductions would depend on giáo dục the public to use public transport more, and on governments using tiền công to construct and run efficiently.
There is no doubt that traffic and pollution from vehicles have become huge problems, both in cities and on motorways everywhere. Solving these problems is likely to need more than a simple rise in the price of petrol.
While it is undeniable that xe ô tô cá nhân use is one of the main causes of the increase in traffic and pollution, higher giá xăng are unlikely to giới hạn the number of drivers for long. As this policy would also affect the cost of public transport, it would be very không phổ biến with everyone who needs to travel on the roads. But there are various other biện pháp that could be thi hành that would have a huge effect on these problems.
I think to xử lý the problem of pollution, nhiên liệu sạch hơn (tức nhiên liệu không ít hại đến môi trường hơn) need to be developed. The technology is already available to produce electric cars that would be both quieter and cleaner to use. Persuading manufacturers and travellers to áp dụng this new technology would be a more effective strategy for improving chất lượng không khí, especially in cities.
However, sự tắc nghẽn giao thông will not be solved by changing the type of phương tiện cá nhân people can use. To do this, we need to improve the choice of public transport services available to travellers. For example, if đủ sky trains and underground train systems were built and effectively maintained in our major cities, then traffic on the roads would be dramatically reduced. Long-distance train and coach services should be made attractive and có thể chi trả sự thay thế to drive your own car for long journeys.
In conclusion, I think that long-term traffic and pollution reductions would depend on giáo dục the public to use public transport more, and on governments using tiền công to construct and run efficiently.
