Luyện tập: Art: Free Admission to Art Galleries and Museums
24/10/2024 2024-10-24 22:33Luyện tập: Art: Free Admission to Art Galleries and Museums
Topic statementMuseums are a vitalsống còn, thiết yếu part of any nation’s cultural life, and high visitor numbers are a desirableđáng ao ước indicatorsự chỉ thị of their health and popularity. OpinionHowever, it seems to me that making museums universally1 cách phổ biến free is unnecessary, and even counter-productivephản tác dụng, in our efforts to make them more attractive.
Topic statementFor one thing, we should remember that many potentialcó tiềm năng visitors to museums are able to pay an admission chargephí vào cửa and would not objectphản đối to this. ExampleFor example, in London, we see many thousands of wealthy tourists who have paid large sumssố tiền to travel, and for whom a modestvừa phải entry chargephí vào cửa would be no inconveniencesự bất tiện. Supporting statementIndeed, applying a small feetiền phí would enablelàm cho có khả năng museums to collect revenuedoanh thu which could be used to conservebảo tồn the exhibitsvật triển lãm, extendmở rộng the collections and put on further displayssự trưng bày and so on. ResultThis would in turn make the institutiontổ chức more attractive, so that more visitors arrive. ExampleThe Guggenheim museums in the USA and Europe are an interesting example of museums which constantlymột cách liên tục refresh their contents in this way. Topic statementFinally, we should remember that not all museums are publicly owned, and indeed there are numerous smaller, private institutions (for example in Russia or the Middle East) which rely on entry fees to survive. Supporting statementAbolishingbãi bỏ such fees would be vastlymột cách to lớn expensive in terms ofvề mặt state subsidiestrợ cấp chính phủ, and would surely have little impact on visitor numbers.
OpinionAdmittedly, I agree with those who say that universally free museums are a symbol of an equalcông bằng and advancedtiên tiến society, showcasingtrưng bày national heritagedi sản and learning for everyone. Supporting statementHowever, the use of affordablecó thể chi trả entry fees (certainly with exemptionssự miễn trừ for children, the unemployednhững người thất nghiệp, students and others) may well add to the museums’ effectivenesssự hiệu quả as such showcases.
OpinionOverall, I feel that modestvừa phải charges are justifiablehợp lý, chính đáng, and indeed useful, in our efforts to broaden accesssự tiếp cận and improve our museums, provided that nobody is excludedloại trừ on the grounds of cost.
Museums are a sống còn, thiết yếu part of any nation’s cultural life, and high visitor numbers are a đáng ao ước sự chỉ thị of their health and popularity. However, it seems to me that making museums 1 cách phổ biến free is unnecessary, and even phản tác dụng, in our efforts to make them more attractive.
For one thing, we should remember that many có tiềm năng visitors to museums are able to pay an phí vào cửa and would not phản đối to this. For example, in London, we see many thousands of wealthy tourists who have paid large số tiền to travel, and for whom a vừa phải phí vào cửa would be no sự bất tiện. Indeed, applying a small tiền phí would làm cho có khả năng museums to collect doanh thu which could be used to bảo tồn the vật triển lãm, mở rộng the collections and put on further sự trưng bày and so on. This would in turn make the tổ chức more attractive, so that more visitors arrive. The Guggenheim museums in the USA and Europe are an interesting example of museums which một cách liên tục refresh their contents in this way. Finally, we should remember that not all museums are publicly owned, and indeed there are numerous smaller, private institutions (for example in Russia or the Middle East) which rely on entry fees to survive. bãi bỏ such fees would be một cách to lớn expensive về mặt trợ cấp chính phủ, and would surely have little impact on visitor numbers.
Admittedly, I agree with those who say that universally free museums are a symbol of an công bằng and tiên tiến society, trưng bày national di sản and learning for everyone. However, the use of có thể chi trả entry fees (certainly with sự miễn trừ for children, những người thất nghiệp, students and others) may well add to the museums’ sự hiệu quả as such showcases.
Overall, I feel that vừa phải charges are hợp lý, chính đáng, and indeed useful, in our efforts to broaden sự tiếp cận and improve our museums, provided that nobody is loại trừ on the grounds of cost.
Museums are a sống còn, thiết yếu part of any nation’s cultural life, and high visitor numbers are a đáng ao ước sự chỉ thị of their health and popularity. However, it seems to me that making museums 1 cách phổ biến free is unnecessary, and even phản tác dụng, in our efforts to make them more attractive.
For one thing, we should remember that many có tiềm năng visitors to museums are able to pay an phí vào cửa and would not phản đối to this. For example, in London, we see many thousands of wealthy tourists who have paid large số tiền to travel, and for whom a vừa phải phí vào cửa would be no sự bất tiện. Indeed, applying a small tiền phí would làm cho có khả năng museums to collect doanh thu which could be used to bảo tồn the vật triển lãm, mở rộng the collections and put on further sự trưng bày and so on. This would in turn make the tổ chức more attractive, so that more visitors arrive. The Guggenheim museums in the USA and Europe are an interesting example of museums which một cách liên tục refresh their contents in this way. Finally, we should remember that not all museums are publicly owned, and indeed there are numerous smaller, private institutions (for example in Russia or the Middle East) which rely on entry fees to survive. bãi bỏ such fees would be một cách to lớn expensive về mặt trợ cấp chính phủ, and would surely have little impact on visitor numbers.
Admittedly, I agree with those who say that universally free museums are a symbol of an công bằng and tiên tiến society, trưng bày national di sản and learning for everyone. However, the use of có thể chi trả entry fees (certainly with sự miễn trừ for children, những người thất nghiệp, students and others) may well add to the museums’ sự hiệu quả as such showcases.
Overall, I feel that vừa phải charges are hợp lý, chính đáng, and indeed useful, in our efforts to broaden sự tiếp cận and improve our museums, provided that nobody is loại trừ on the grounds of cost.
