Luyện tập: Animal Testing - Khóa học sinh viên Drive

Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Hiện nghĩa

Hiện vai trò câu

Highlight nội dung

Topic statementIt is true that medicines and other products are routinelythường xuyên tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. OpinionWhile I tend towardsnghiêng về, hướng đến the viewpoint that animal testing is morallyvề mặt đạo đức wrong, I would have to support a limitedgiới hạn amount of animal experimentationsự thí nghiệm for the development of medicines.

Topic statementOn the one hand, there are clear ethicalthuộc đạo đức arguments against animal experimentation. ExampleTo use a common example of this practice, laboratoryphòng thí nghiệm mice may be given an illness so that the effectivenesssự có hiệu lực of a new drug can be measured. Supporting statementOpponentsngười phản đối of such research argue that humans have no right to subjectbắt phải chịu animals to this kind of traumatổn thương, chấn động, and that the lives of all creatures should be respectedtôn trọng. Supporting statementThey believe that the benefits to humans do not justifybiện hộ the sufferingsự đau đớn caused, and that scientists should use alternativethay thế methods of research.

Topic statementOn the other hand, reliableđáng tin cậy alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporting statementSupportersngười ủng hộ of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. Supporting statementThey argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatmentchữa trị về y học that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. OpinionPersonally, I agree with the banningviệc cấm đoán of animal testing for non-medicalkhông liên quan đến y học products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evilsự độc ác where new drugs and medical proceduresquy trình are concerned.

OpinionIn conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vitalsống còn, thiết yếu medical research until equally1 cách công bằng effective alternatives have been developed.

proceduresevilnon-medicalbanningalternativesufferingjustifyrespectedsubjectopponentsethicalexperimentationlimitedmorallytend towardsroutinelylaboratoryeffectivenesstraumareliablesupportersmedical treatmentvitalequally

It is true that medicines and other products are thường xuyên tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I nghiêng về, hướng đến the viewpoint that animal testing is về mặt đạo đức wrong, I would have to support a giới hạn amount of animal sự thí nghiệm for the development of medicines.

On the one hand, there are clear thuộc đạo đức arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, phòng thí nghiệm mice may be given an illness so that the sự có hiệu lực of a new drug can be measured. người phản đối of such research argue that humans have no right to bắt phải chịu animals to this kind of tổn thương, chấn động, and that the lives of all creatures should be tôn trọng. They believe that the benefits to humans do not biện hộ the sự đau đớn caused, and that scientists should use thay thế methods of research.

On the other hand, đáng tin cậy alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. người ủng hộ of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a chữa trị về y học that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the việc cấm đoán of animal testing for không liên quan đến y học products, but I feel that it may be a necessary sự độc ác where new drugs and medical quy trình are concerned.

In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for sống còn, thiết yếu medical research until 1 cách công bằng effective alternatives have been developed.