Luyện tập: Protecting Wild Animals
01/11/2024 2024-11-01 17:03Luyện tập: Protecting Wild Animals
Topic statementSome people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protectionsự bảo vệ of wild animalsđộng vật hoang dã because we humans have no need for them. OpinionI completely disagree with this point of view.
Topic statementIn my opinion, it is absurdvô lý, lố bịch to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. Supporting statementI do not believe that planet EarthTrái Đất exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinctionsự tuyệt chủng of any speciesgiống loài. Supporting statementFurthermore, there is no compellingcó sức thuyết phục reason why we should let animals die outchết dần đi. ExampleWe do not need to exploitbóc lột, lợi dụng or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodatecung cấp cho, làm cho phù hợp the world’s population. Supporting statementThere is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
Topic statementI also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resourcestài nguyên. Supporting statementIt is usually the protection of natural habitatsmôi trường sống tự nhiên that ensures the survivalsự sống sót of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. ExampleFor example, rainforestsrừng mưa nhiệt đới produce oxygen, absorbhấp thụ carbon dioxide and stabiliselàm cân bằng the Earth’s climate. Alternative statementIf we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservationsự bảo tồn. ResultBy protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balancesự cân bằng tự nhiên of all life on Earth.
OpinionIn conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the sự bảo vệ of động vật hoang dã because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
In my opinion, it is vô lý, lố bịch to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that Trái Đất exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the sự tuyệt chủng of any giống loài. Furthermore, there is no có sức thuyết phục reason why we should let animals chết dần đi. We do not need to bóc lột, lợi dụng or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or cung cấp cho, làm cho phù hợp the world’s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of tài nguyên. It is usually the protection of môi trường sống tự nhiên that ensures the sự sống sót of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rừng mưa nhiệt đới produce oxygen, hấp thụ carbon dioxide and làm cân bằng the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of sự bảo tồn. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the sự cân bằng tự nhiên of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the sự bảo vệ of động vật hoang dã because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
In my opinion, it is vô lý, lố bịch to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that Trái Đất exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the sự tuyệt chủng of any giống loài. Furthermore, there is no có sức thuyết phục reason why we should let animals chết dần đi. We do not need to bóc lột, lợi dụng or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or cung cấp cho, làm cho phù hợp the world’s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of tài nguyên. It is usually the protection of môi trường sống tự nhiên that ensures the sự sống sót of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rừng mưa nhiệt đới produce oxygen, hấp thụ carbon dioxide and làm cân bằng the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of sự bảo tồn. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the sự cân bằng tự nhiên of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.
