Luyện tập: Agriculture versus Hunger
06/11/2024 2024-11-06 17:40Luyện tập: Agriculture versus Hunger
Topic statementRecent years have witnessedchứng kiến tremendouskhủng khiếp developments in agricultural science yet every day people all over the world continue to suffer and even die from hunger. OpinionIn my opinion, this is because innovations rarely impactsự ảnh hưởng the developing world and the best solution for it is to direct humanitariannhân đạo fundinggây quỹ towards these advances.
Topic statementThe main cause of more advanced agricultural methods not reaching the people who need it the most is that the developing world has trouble implementingthi hành these methods. Supporting statementThere are a number of reasons for this ranging from limitedcó giới hạn financialvề tài chính resources to poor existingđang tồn tại infrastructure to political instabilitysự bất ổn chính trị, depending on the country in question. ExampleOne example of this would be in many African nations, where malnourishmentsự suy dinh dưỡng has historicallytrong lịch sự been highest. ExampleCountries like the Congo have seen revolutioncuộc cách mạng after revolution over the last several decadesthập kỷ, which has effectively destabilisedmất ổn định the entire country. Supporting statementThe universities where students would learn about changes in agriculture are frequentlythường xuyên shut downđóng cửa or destroyed. Supporting statementThe young people who would become agricultural scientists end updẫn đến drawn into the conflictmâu thuẫn as soldiersquân lính or victimsnạn nhân. Supporting statementLong-term economic neglectlơ là means that the government has very limited ability to subsidisetrợ cấp farming. Supporting statementThese problems are presenthiện diện to varying degrees in countries around the world and offer one possible explanationsự giải thích for the continued prevalencesự phổ biến of hunger.
Topic statementThe solution that I believe would be most effective is directingđiều hướng humanitariannhân đạo funds previously focused on food aidviện trợ lương thực towards education and agricultural infrastructure. Supporting statementFood aid is a notoriouslycó tiếng xấu poor solution because it only offers an immediatengay lập tức solution and warlordslãnh chúa often exploitlợi dụng it to support their continued mistreatmentsự ngược đãi of their people. Supporting statementIt hurts more than it helps. SolutionHowever, there would be better long-term effects if international organisations and governments redirectedđiều hướng lại that money into helping build better farms, provide more modern equipment, and sending qualifiedcó đủ năng lực professionschuyên gia to train people in need. ExampleThere is a TedTalk by a young man in Kenya who built his own windmillcối xay gió out of old bicycle parts and by reading a book in the local library. Supporting statementIt is large enough to power his own house and he was seekingtìm kiếm financingtài trợ for a larger one that would power irrigation channelskênh tưới tiêu for the entire village. Supporting statementIf more people like him can be found or trained then this will have an impact that lasts for decades and is relativelytương đối imperviouskhông bị tác động to the factors preventing agricultural advances from taking rootmọc rễ, bắt đầu in developing countries.
SummaryIn conclusion, developing companies face myriadvô số problems that hinderche lấp their ability to take advantage of newer agricultural models and we should direct more funding to helping these countries learn more about new farming methods. SummaryThis is likely to be an important issue in the world as the gap between rich and poor, developed and undevelopedkém phát triển widens while technological progress continues its indifferentvô tâm marchsự tiến triển forward.
Recent years have chứng kiến khủng khiếp developments in agricultural science yet every day people all over the world continue to suffer and even die from hunger. In my opinion, this is because innovations rarely sự ảnh hưởng the developing world and the best solution for it is to direct nhân đạo gây quỹ towards these advances.
The main cause of more advanced agricultural methods not reaching the people who need it the most is that the developing world has trouble thi hành these methods. There are a number of reasons for this ranging from có giới hạn về tài chính resources to poor đang tồn tại infrastructure to sự bất ổn chính trị, depending on the country in question. One example of this would be in many African nations, where sự suy dinh dưỡng has trong lịch sự been highest. Countries like the Congo have seen cuộc cách mạng after revolution over the last several thập kỷ, which has effectively mất ổn định the entire country. The universities where students would learn about changes in agriculture are thường xuyên đóng cửa or destroyed. The young people who would become agricultural scientists dẫn đến drawn into the mâu thuẫn as quân lính or nạn nhân. Long-term economic lơ là means that the government has very limited ability to trợ cấp farming. These problems are hiện diện to varying degrees in countries around the world and offer one possible sự giải thích for the continued sự phổ biến of hunger.
The solution that I believe would be most effective is điều hướng nhân đạo funds previously focused onviện trợ lương thực towards education and agricultural infrastructure. Food aid is a có tiếng xấu poor solution because it only offers an ngay lập tức solution and lãnh chúa often lợi dụng it to support their continued sự ngược đãi of their people. It hurts more than it helps. However, there would be better long-term effects if international organisations and governments điều hướng lại that money into helping build better farms, provide more modern equipment, and sending có đủ năng lực chuyên gia to train people in need. There is a TedTalk by a young man in Kenya who built his own cối xay gió out of old bicycle parts and by reading a book in the local library. It is large enough to power his own house and he was tìm kiếm tài trợ for a larger one that would power kênh tưới tiêu for the entire village. If more people like him can be found or trained then this will have an impact that lasts for decades and is tương đối không bị tác động to the factors preventing agricultural advances from mọc rễ, bắt đầu in developing countries.
In conclusion, developing companies face vô số problems that che lấp their ability to take advantage of newer agricultural models and we should direct more funding to helping these countries learn more about new farming methods. This is likely to be an important issue in the world as the gap between rich and poor, developed and kém phát triển widens while technological progress continues its vô tâm sự tiến triển forward.
