Topic statementIt is true that some minoritythiểu số languages may disappear in the near future. OpinionAlthough it can be argued that governments could save money by allowing this to happen, I believe that these languages should be protected and preservedbảo tồn.
Topic statementThere are several reasons why saving minority languages could be seen as /a/ waste of money. Supporting statementFirstly, if a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programmes will be needed to make sure that more people learn it, and the statequốc gia, bang will have to pay for facilitiescơ sở vật chất, teachers and marketingsự quảng bá. Supporting statementThis money might be better spent on other public servicesdịch cụ công cộng. Supporting statementSecondly, it would be much cheaper and more efficientcó hiệu quả for countries to have just one language. Supporting statementGovernments could cut all kinds of costs related to communicating with each minority group.
Topic statementDespite the above arguments, I believe that governments should try to preserve languages that are less widelymột cách rộng lớn spoken. Supporting statementA language is much more than simplymột cách đơn giản a means of communication; it has a vitalthiết yếu connection with the cultural identitybản sắc văn hóa of the people who speak it. Alternative statementIf a language disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and we will lose the rich cultural diversitysự đa dạng văn hóa that makes societies more interesting. Supporting statementBy spending money to protect minority languages, governments can also preserve traditions, customstục lệ and behaviours that are part of a country’s history.
OpinionIn conclusion, it may save money in the short termthời gian ngắn if we allow minority languages to disappear, but in the long termthời gian dài this would have an extremely negative impact on our cultural heritagedi sản văn hóa.
